Newsgroups: alt.cd-rom
From: Andy@armswalk.demon.co.uk (Andy Armstrong)
Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!demon!armswalk.demon.co.uk!Andy
Subject: Re: Double speed drives & MPC-2
References: <fredtCMMD7L.MHF@netcom.com>
Organization: Armstrong Walker Ltd
Reply-To: Andy@armswalk.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
Lines: 35
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 12:32:26 +0000
Message-ID: <763734746snz@armswalk.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article <fredtCMMD7L.MHF@netcom.com> fredt@netcom.com "Fred Tempereau" writes:

> I'm ready to buy a double speed drive (I currently use a Mitsumi 5s),
> and the temptation is to upgrade to the Mitsumi double speed (a local
> retailer is selling it for $165 w/controller). 
> 
> Here's some random worries:
> 
> -Mitsumi only has a 32k buffer thus making it inelegible for the MPC-2
>  standard. Is this important? has anyone seen any speed comparisons in
>  the computer magazines?
Fred,

We have started shipping the Mitsumi FX001D double speed drive with our own
proprietory interface here in the UK (this for the decidedly non-DOS
non-Intel Acorn Archimedes RISC based PC).

We recently tendered for a government contract to supply CD ROM systems
to schools, and one of the stipulations was that the drives should have a
64k buffer. It turns out that the FX001D is actually pinned out for 64k
but is shipped with only 32k, presumably because Mitsumi feel that any
performance effect is negligable. In spite of this Mitsumi (very helpful
company) were able to fax us details of the upgrade to 64k which involves
moving a resistor and adding the extra RAM chip.

We have CD ROM performance test software of our own which was able to detect
no significant difference after the buffer was added, although to be fair
the test code is specifically designed to see through the effects of the
buffer!

We have not had a chance to speed test the drive on any industry standard
benchmark software, although I believe that Mitsumi consider the performance
effect negligable.

Andy Armstrong, Armstrong Walker Ltd
