Newsgroups: alt.cd-rom.reviews,alt.cd-rom
Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!decwrl!hookup!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.duc.auburn.edu!mallard!lestewm
From: lestewm@mail.auburn.edu (Miles Lester)
Subject: Re: CD-ROMs not a ripoff was: Re: CIA World Fact Book...BAH!
Message-ID: <CnFtBs.JIL@mail.auburn.edu>
Followup-To: alt.cd-rom.reviews,alt.cd-rom
Sender: usenet@mail.auburn.edu (Usenet Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mallard.duc.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <BETSYS.94Mar27223724@terminus.cs.umb.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 1994 17:45:27 GMT
Lines: 20

Elizabeth Schwartz (betsys@cs.umb.edu) wrote:

>  What puzzles *me* is when the same program costs more on CD-ROM than on
>disk. I know some CD-ROM games have extra sound and graphics, and some
>CD-ROM versions of software come with extra bonuses. But, some programs
>charge more for the identical program! Lost Treasures of Infocom was
>cheaper on floppy (at least for a while) even though the CD-ROM probably
>cost less to produce and ship!

This is not always the case. I recently purchased OS/2 for Windows on 
CD-ROM. The cost of a 30+ diskette package was $49, whereas the cost of
the single CD-ROM was only $39.
 

--
________________________________________________________________
  Miles Lester                | "Why are we here?                
  lestewm@mail.auburn.edu     |       Because we're here,        
  mlester@auducvax.bitnet     |           Roll the Bones" (rush)  
_____ Administrative Computing Services Auburn University ______
