Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!agate!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!news.bu.edu!att-in!csn!news.den.mmc.com!iplmail.orl.mmc.com!sirius!wwilliam From: wwilliam@orl.mmc.com (William Williamson, 4289) Newsgroups: alt.cd-rom Subject: Re: Mitsumi drive FX series Date: 25 May 1994 21:29:19 GMT Organization: Martin Marietta Orlando Lines: 29 Distribution: world Message-ID: <2s0fvf$6um@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> References: <2rvh93$151@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> Reply-To: wwilliam@orl.mmc.com NNTP-Posting-Host: sirius.orl.mmc.com In article 151@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca, mjscott@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Mike J. Scott) writes: :There are two things at work here: single speed vs double speed, and :two different 'formats' (this isn't the right term, but I'm not sure what :is). The 'single speed' is ~150k/s while dbl ~300k/s. The two different :formats allow something like 570Meg max vs 650Meg max. I don't know the :significance of this, but basically, one of these 'formats' (I think the :650M) will be read faster than the other, resulting in a performance :boost. : Basically, the difference between Mode 1 and Mode 2 formats is the amount of error correction embedded in the data. Mode 1 has more error correction than Mode 2. Mode 1 is intended for use with data in which a bit error could be 'catastrophic', e.g. - executable files. Mode 2 is intended to be used for data like digital images or digital audio where bit errors are not as important. So, if you wanted to publish a CD of WAV files, you could use Mode 2 so as to get more data on the CD - with the added advantage of being able to read it off faster due to less overhead caused by ECC. This is a simplistic but accurate explanation. --- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Williamson : My opinions are not those wwilliam@polaris.orl.mmc.com : of my employer. Mine are : free. My employer's can be Orlando, Florida : had for a price. ------------------------------------------------------------