Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!convex!constellation!yokm!okgate.uucp!1039!Shane.Gray
From: Shane.Gray%1039%okgate@yokm.pillar.com (Shane Gray)
Newsgroups: alt.cd-rom
Subject: Re: SCSI I VS SCSI II
Message-ID: <9f9_9406071802@okgate.uucp>
Date: 06 Jun 94 00:21:00 -0600
Organization: FidoNet Gateway, Oklahoma City
X-Mail-Agent: GIGO+ sn 19 at okgate vsn 0.99 pl1
X-FTN-To: Daniel.dillman@granite.mn
Lines: 17

 -=> Quoting Daniel.dillman@granite.mn to All <=-

 Da> SCSI II is faster, and is a more rigid standard.  This makes it
 Da> practically assured that any SCSI II device will coexist with your
 Da> other SCSI II devices.
 Da> Nope.  These SCSI interfaces aren't designed for use with a lot of
 Da> SCSI devices.  They're designed to connect a CD-ROM.  You *MAY* be able
 Da> to connect a hard drive, but you *WON'T be able to boot from it.  You
 Da> *MAY* be able to connect your tape drive.  YMMV.

What about the PAS that has a SCSI II port?  Would it work as well as
a SCSI II card?
Thanks for the info
Shane

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12