Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!parc!biosci!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!relay!relay2!curley.nswc.navy.mil!usenet
From: whiles@relay.nswc.navy.mil (Scott Hiles)
Newsgroups: comp.publish.cdrom.multimedia
Subject: Re: Copywrite on old paintings
Date: 6 May 1994 14:13:58 GMT
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division
Lines: 34
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2qdjb6$ne2@curley.b35ita.sunoco>
References: <CpDA17.ACr@qus102.qld.tne.oz.au>
Reply-To: whiles@relay.nswc.navy.mil
NNTP-Posting-Host: sholeh.b35ita.sunoco

In article ACr@qus102.qld.tne.oz.au, pclink@qus102.qld.tne.oz.au (Rick) writes:
>philip@walkden.demon.co.uk (Philip Howells) writes:
>
>>I've always understood this to be the case but interestingly, when I was at the 
>>Louvre Musuem in Paris last week the authorities made no attempt to stop the 
>>photographing of any exhibit.  True they don't permit tripods but they openly 
>>encourage you to take cameras into the museum - they actually oblige you to 
>>take them out of your left luggage (which isn't allowed in!)
>
>Then it's changed some since I visited in '86.  Back then, the only
>English words in the entire museum (at least, I couldn't find any
>others) were the words "NO PHOTOGRAPHS".  A member of the group I
>was with snuck a camera in, and the camera flash from photographing
>Mona got the guards _very_ agitated.  The explanation given at the
>time was that bright lights were harmful to the painting, which would
>explain the darkness of the case.
>
>Rick.


This is the same as at the Smithsonian in Washington DC.  You are allowed
to use cameras, but you are not allowed to use a Flash.  If you forget
there are plenty of guards which are more than happy to escorte you
out of the building.

Scott

---
whiles@relay.nswc.navy.mil
Standard disclaimer:
  The opinions expressed are those of my own and do not necessarily 
  reflect those of the DOD or the Navy.  I accept full responsibility.


