Path: cdrom.com!barrnet.net!parc!biosci!hubcap.clemson.edu!gatech!udel!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!aplcenmp!jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu!jobone!lynx.unm.edu!carina.unm.edu!not-for-mail
From: rsquires@unm.edu (roger m squires)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.cd-rom,alt.cd-rom
Subject: Re: NEC CDR-510 vs. 500
Date: 28 Jul 1994 12:54:44 -0600
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <318utk$1m3@carina.unm.edu>
References: <318k2u$kpa@marsupial.jpl.nasa.gov> <318nsc$42e@tusk.lm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu
Xref: cdrom.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.cd-rom:4057 alt.cd-rom:7446

>But how about performance, speed, and reliability?  Has anyone checked it out?
>Mike Stefanini

	Yes, see the article in the August Computer Shopper.
	They recommend getting a quad-speed device.
	BTW, I have the 510 and have no complaints, but again
	you'd be smarter to spend the extra $100 or whatever
	for a quad.

>Quake

rms