This is f/g77.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.0 from
/usr/src/gnu/egcs/gcc/f/g77.texi.

INFO-DIR-SECTION Programming
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
* g77: (g77).                  The GNU Fortran compiler.
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
   This file documents the use and the internals of the GNU Fortran
(`g77') compiler.  It corresponds to the GCC-2.95 version of `g77'.

   Published by the Free Software Foundation 59 Temple Place - Suite 330
Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA

   Copyright (C) 1995-1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

   Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
preserved on all copies.

   Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of
this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also
that the sections entitled "GNU General Public License," "Funding for
Free Software," and "Protect Your Freedom--Fight `Look And Feel'" are
included exactly as in the original, and provided that the entire
resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission
notice identical to this one.

   Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this
manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified
versions, except that the sections entitled "GNU General Public
License," "Funding for Free Software," and "Protect Your Freedom--Fight
`Look And Feel'", and this permission notice, may be included in
translations approved by the Free Software Foundation instead of in the
original English.

   Contributed by James Craig Burley (<craig@jcb-sc.com>).  Inspired by
a first pass at translating `g77-0.5.16/f/DOC' that was contributed to
Craig by David Ronis (<ronis@onsager.chem.mcgill.ca>).


File: g77.info,  Node: INCLUDE,  Next: Cpp-style directives,  Prev: Order,  Up: Characters Lines Sequence

Including Source Text
---------------------

   Additional source text may be included in the processing of the
source file via the `INCLUDE' directive:

     INCLUDE FILENAME

The source text to be included is identified by FILENAME, which is a
literal GNU Fortran character constant.  The meaning and interpretation
of FILENAME depends on the implementation, but typically is a filename.

   (`g77' treats it as a filename that it searches for in the current
directory and/or directories specified via the `-I' command-line
option.)

   The effect of the `INCLUDE' directive is as if the included text
directly replaced the directive in the source file prior to
interpretation of the program.  Included text may itself use `INCLUDE'.
The depth of nested `INCLUDE' references depends on the implementation,
but typically is a positive integer.

   This virtual replacement treats the statements and `INCLUDE'
directives in the included text as syntactically distinct from those in
the including text.

   Therefore, the first non-comment line of the included text must not
be a continuation line.  The included text must therefore have, after
the non-comment lines, either an initial line (statement), an `INCLUDE'
directive, or nothing (the end of the included text).

   Similarly, the including text may end the `INCLUDE' directive with a
semicolon or the end of the line, but it cannot follow an `INCLUDE'
directive at the end of its line with a continuation line.  Thus, the
last statement in an included text may not be continued.

   Any statements between two `INCLUDE' directives on the same line are
treated as if they appeared in between the respective included texts.
For example:

     INCLUDE 'A'; PRINT *, 'B'; INCLUDE 'C'; END PROGRAM

If the text included by `INCLUDE 'A'' constitutes a `PRINT *, 'A''
statement and the text included by `INCLUDE 'C'' constitutes a `PRINT
*, 'C'' statement, then the output of the above sample program would be

     A
     B
     C

(with suitable allowances for how an implementation defines its
handling of output).

   Included text must not include itself directly or indirectly,
regardless of whether the FILENAME used to reference the text is the
same.

   Note that `INCLUDE' is _not_ a statement.  As such, it is neither a
non-executable or executable statement.  However, if the text it
includes constitutes one or more executable statements, then the
placement of `INCLUDE' is subject to effectively the same restrictions
as those on executable statements.

   An `INCLUDE' directive may be continued across multiple lines as if
it were a statement.  This permits long names to be used for FILENAME.


File: g77.info,  Node: Cpp-style directives,  Prev: INCLUDE,  Up: Characters Lines Sequence

Cpp-style directives
--------------------

   `cpp' output-style `#' directives (*note C Preprocessor Output:
(cpp)C Preprocessor Output.)  are recognized by the compiler even when
the preprocessor isn't run on the input (as it is when compiling `.F'
files).  (Note the distinction between these `cpp' `#' _output_
directives and `#line' _input_ directives.)


File: g77.info,  Node: Data Types and Constants,  Next: Expressions,  Prev: Characters Lines Sequence,  Up: Language

Data Types and Constants
========================

   (The following information augments or overrides the information in
Chapter 4 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77 in specifying the GNU Fortran
language.  Chapter 4 of that document otherwise serves as the basis for
the relevant aspects of GNU Fortran.)

   To more concisely express the appropriate types for entities, this
document uses the more concise Fortran 90 nomenclature such as
`INTEGER(KIND=1)' instead of the more traditional, but less portably
concise, byte-size-based nomenclature such as `INTEGER*4', wherever
reasonable.

   When referring to generic types--in contexts where the specific
precision and range of a type are not important--this document uses the
generic type names `INTEGER', `LOGICAL', `REAL', `COMPLEX', and
`CHARACTER'.

   In some cases, the context requires specification of a particular
type.  This document uses the `KIND=' notation to accomplish this
throughout, sometimes supplying the more traditional notation for
clarification, though the traditional notation might not work the same
way on all GNU Fortran implementations.

   Use of `KIND=' makes this document more concise because `g77' is
able to define values for `KIND=' that have the same meanings on all
systems, due to the way the Fortran 90 standard specifies these values
are to be used.

   (In particular, that standard permits an implementation to
arbitrarily assign nonnegative values.  There are four distinct sets of
assignments: one to the `CHARACTER' type; one to the `INTEGER' type;
one to the `LOGICAL' type; and the fourth to both the `REAL' and
`COMPLEX' types.  Implementations are free to assign these values in
any order, leave gaps in the ordering of assignments, and assign more
than one value to a representation.)

   This makes `KIND=' values superior to the values used in
non-standard statements such as `INTEGER*4', because the meanings of
the values in those statements vary from machine to machine, compiler
to compiler, even operating system to operating system.

   However, use of `KIND=' is _not_ generally recommended when writing
portable code (unless, for example, the code is going to be compiled
only via `g77', which is a widely ported compiler).  GNU Fortran does
not yet have adequate language constructs to permit use of `KIND=' in a
fashion that would make the code portable to Fortran 90
implementations; and, this construct is known to _not_ be accepted by
many popular FORTRAN 77 implementations, so it cannot be used in code
that is to be ported to those.

   The distinction here is that this document is able to use specific
values for `KIND=' to concisely document the types of various
operations and operands.

   A Fortran program should use the FORTRAN 77 designations for the
appropriate GNU Fortran types--such as `INTEGER' for `INTEGER(KIND=1)',
`REAL' for `REAL(KIND=1)', and `DOUBLE COMPLEX' for
`COMPLEX(KIND=2)'--and, where no such designations exist, make use of
appropriate techniques (preprocessor macros, parameters, and so on) to
specify the types in a fashion that may be easily adjusted to suit each
particular implementation to which the program is ported.  (These types
generally won't need to be adjusted for ports of `g77'.)

   Further details regarding GNU Fortran data types and constants are
provided below.

* Menu:

* Types::
* Constants::
* Integer Type::
* Character Type::


File: g77.info,  Node: Types,  Next: Constants,  Up: Data Types and Constants

Data Types
----------

   (Corresponds to Section 4.1 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77.)

   GNU Fortran supports these types:

  1. Integer (generic type `INTEGER')

  2. Real (generic type `REAL')

  3. Double precision

  4. Complex (generic type `COMPLEX')

  5. Logical (generic type `LOGICAL')

  6. Character (generic type `CHARACTER')

  7. Double Complex

   (The types numbered 1 through 6 above are standard FORTRAN 77 types.)

   The generic types shown above are referred to in this document using
only their generic type names.  Such references usually indicate that
any specific type (kind) of that generic type is valid.

   For example, a context described in this document as accepting the
`COMPLEX' type also is likely to accept the `DOUBLE COMPLEX' type.

   The GNU Fortran language supports three ways to specify a specific
kind of a generic type.

* Menu:

* Double Notation::  As in `DOUBLE COMPLEX'.
* Star Notation::    As in `INTEGER*4'.
* Kind Notation::    As in `INTEGER(KIND=1)'.


File: g77.info,  Node: Double Notation,  Next: Star Notation,  Up: Types

Double Notation
...............

   The GNU Fortran language supports two uses of the keyword `DOUBLE'
to specify a specific kind of type:

   * `DOUBLE PRECISION', equivalent to `REAL(KIND=2)'

   * `DOUBLE COMPLEX', equivalent to `COMPLEX(KIND=2)'

   Use one of the above forms where a type name is valid.

   While use of this notation is popular, it doesn't scale well in a
language or dialect rich in intrinsic types, as is the case for the GNU
Fortran language (especially planned future versions of it).

   After all, one rarely sees type names such as `DOUBLE INTEGER',
`QUADRUPLE REAL', or `QUARTER INTEGER'.  Instead, `INTEGER*8',
`REAL*16', and `INTEGER*1' often are substituted for these,
respectively, even though they do not always have the same meanings on
all systems.  (And, the fact that `DOUBLE REAL' does not exist as such
is an inconsistency.)

   Therefore, this document uses "double notation" only on occasion for
the benefit of those readers who are accustomed to it.


File: g77.info,  Node: Star Notation,  Next: Kind Notation,  Prev: Double Notation,  Up: Types

Star Notation
.............

   The following notation specifies the storage size for a type:

     GENERIC-TYPE*N

GENERIC-TYPE must be a generic type--one of `INTEGER', `REAL',
`COMPLEX', `LOGICAL', or `CHARACTER'.  N must be one or more digits
comprising a decimal integer number greater than zero.

   Use the above form where a type name is valid.

   The `*N' notation specifies that the amount of storage occupied by
variables and array elements of that type is N times the storage
occupied by a `CHARACTER*1' variable.

   This notation might indicate a different degree of precision and/or
range for such variables and array elements, and the functions that
return values of types using this notation.  It does not limit the
precision or range of values of that type in any particular way--use
explicit code to do that.

   Further, the GNU Fortran language requires no particular values for
N to be supported by an implementation via the `*N' notation.  `g77'
supports `INTEGER*1' (as `INTEGER(KIND=3)') on all systems, for example,
but not all implementations are required to do so, and `g77' is known
to not support `REAL*1' on most (or all) systems.

   As a result, except for GENERIC-TYPE of `CHARACTER', uses of this
notation should be limited to isolated portions of a program that are
intended to handle system-specific tasks and are expected to be
non-portable.

   (Standard FORTRAN 77 supports the `*N' notation for only
`CHARACTER', where it signifies not only the amount of storage
occupied, but the number of characters in entities of that type.
However, almost all Fortran compilers have supported this notation for
generic types, though with a variety of meanings for N.)

   Specifications of types using the `*N' notation always are
interpreted as specifications of the appropriate types described in
this document using the `KIND=N' notation, described below.

   While use of this notation is popular, it doesn't serve well in the
context of a widely portable dialect of Fortran, such as the GNU
Fortran language.

   For example, even on one particular machine, two or more popular
Fortran compilers might well disagree on the size of a type declared
`INTEGER*2' or `REAL*16'.  Certainly there is known to be disagreement
over such things among Fortran compilers on _different_ systems.

   Further, this notation offers no elegant way to specify sizes that
are not even multiples of the "byte size" typically designated by
`INTEGER*1'.  Use of "absurd" values (such as `INTEGER*1000') would
certainly be possible, but would perhaps be stretching the original
intent of this notation beyond the breaking point in terms of
widespread readability of documentation and code making use of it.

   Therefore, this document uses "star notation" only on occasion for
the benefit of those readers who are accustomed to it.


File: g77.info,  Node: Kind Notation,  Prev: Star Notation,  Up: Types

Kind Notation
.............

   The following notation specifies the kind-type selector of a type:

     GENERIC-TYPE(KIND=N)

Use the above form where a type name is valid.

   GENERIC-TYPE must be a generic type--one of `INTEGER', `REAL',
`COMPLEX', `LOGICAL', or `CHARACTER'.  N must be an integer
initialization expression that is a positive, nonzero value.

   Programmers are discouraged from writing these values directly into
their code.  Future versions of the GNU Fortran language will offer
facilities that will make the writing of code portable to `g77' _and_
Fortran 90 implementations simpler.

   However, writing code that ports to existing FORTRAN 77
implementations depends on avoiding the `KIND=' construct.

   The `KIND=' construct is thus useful in the context of GNU Fortran
for two reasons:

   * It provides a means to specify a type in a fashion that is
     portable across all GNU Fortran implementations (though not other
     FORTRAN 77 and Fortran 90 implementations).

   * It provides a sort of Rosetta stone for this document to use to
     concisely describe the types of various operations and operands.

   The values of N in the GNU Fortran language are assigned using a
scheme that:

   * Attempts to maximize the ability of readers of this document to
     quickly familiarize themselves with assignments for popular types

   * Provides a unique value for each specific desired meaning

   * Provides a means to automatically assign new values so they have a
     "natural" relationship to existing values, if appropriate, or, if
     no such relationship exists, will not interfere with future values
     assigned on the basis of such relationships

   * Avoids using values that are similar to values used in the
     existing, popular `*N' notation, to prevent readers from expecting
     that these implied correspondences work on all GNU Fortran
     implementations

   The assignment system accomplishes this by assigning to each
"fundamental meaning" of a specific type a unique prime number.
Combinations of fundamental meanings--for example, a type that is two
times the size of some other type--are assigned values of N that are
the products of the values for those fundamental meanings.

   A prime value of N is never given more than one fundamental meaning,
to avoid situations where some code or system cannot reasonably provide
those meanings in the form of a single type.

   The values of N assigned so far are:

`KIND=0'
     This value is reserved for future use.

     The planned future use is for this value to designate, explicitly,
     context-sensitive kind-type selection.  For example, the
     expression `1D0 * 0.1_0' would be equivalent to `1D0 * 0.1D0'.

`KIND=1'
     This corresponds to the default types for `REAL', `INTEGER',
     `LOGICAL', `COMPLEX', and `CHARACTER', as appropriate.

     These are the "default" types described in the Fortran 90 standard,
     though that standard does not assign any particular `KIND=' value
     to these types.

     (Typically, these are `REAL*4', `INTEGER*4', `LOGICAL*4', and
     `COMPLEX*8'.)

`KIND=2'
     This corresponds to types that occupy twice as much storage as the
     default types.  `REAL(KIND=2)' is `DOUBLE PRECISION' (typically
     `REAL*8'), `COMPLEX(KIND=2)' is `DOUBLE COMPLEX' (typically
     `COMPLEX*16'),

     These are the "double precision" types described in the Fortran 90
     standard, though that standard does not assign any particular
     `KIND=' value to these types.

     N of 4 thus corresponds to types that occupy four times as much
     storage as the default types, N of 8 to types that occupy eight
     times as much storage, and so on.

     The `INTEGER(KIND=2)' and `LOGICAL(KIND=2)' types are not
     necessarily supported by every GNU Fortran implementation.

`KIND=3'
     This corresponds to types that occupy as much storage as the
     default `CHARACTER' type, which is the same effective type as
     `CHARACTER(KIND=1)' (making that type effectively the same as
     `CHARACTER(KIND=3)').

     (Typically, these are `INTEGER*1' and `LOGICAL*1'.)

     N of 6 thus corresponds to types that occupy twice as much storage
     as the N=3 types, N of 12 to types that occupy four times as much
     storage, and so on.

     These are not necessarily supported by every GNU Fortran
     implementation.

`KIND=5'
     This corresponds to types that occupy half the storage as the
     default (N=1) types.

     (Typically, these are `INTEGER*2' and `LOGICAL*2'.)

     N of 25 thus corresponds to types that occupy one-quarter as much
     storage as the default types.

     These are not necessarily supported by every GNU Fortran
     implementation.

`KIND=7'
     This is valid only as `INTEGER(KIND=7)' and denotes the `INTEGER'
     type that has the smallest storage size that holds a pointer on
     the system.

     A pointer representable by this type is capable of uniquely
     addressing a `CHARACTER*1' variable, array, array element, or
     substring.

     (Typically this is equivalent to `INTEGER*4' or, on 64-bit
     systems, `INTEGER*8'.  In a compatible C implementation, it
     typically would be the same size and semantics of the C type `void
     *'.)

   Note that these are _proposed_ correspondences and might change in
future versions of `g77'--avoid writing code depending on them while
`g77', and therefore the GNU Fortran language it defines, is in beta
testing.

   Values not specified in the above list are reserved to future
versions of the GNU Fortran language.

   Implementation-dependent meanings will be assigned new, unique prime
numbers so as to not interfere with other implementation-dependent
meanings, and offer the possibility of increasing the portability of
code depending on such types by offering support for them in other GNU
Fortran implementations.

   Other meanings that might be given unique values are:

   * Types that make use of only half their storage size for
     representing precision and range.

     For example, some compilers offer options that cause `INTEGER'
     types to occupy the amount of storage that would be needed for
     `INTEGER(KIND=2)' types, but the range remains that of
     `INTEGER(KIND=1)'.

   * The IEEE single floating-point type.

   * Types with a specific bit pattern (endianness), such as the
     little-endian form of `INTEGER(KIND=1)'.  These could permit,
     conceptually, use of portable code and implementations on data
     files written by existing systems.

   Future _prime_ numbers should be given meanings in as incremental a
fashion as possible, to allow for flexibility and expressiveness in
combining types.

   For example, instead of defining a prime number for little-endian
IEEE doubles, one prime number might be assigned the meaning
"little-endian", another the meaning "IEEE double", and the value of N
for a little-endian IEEE double would thus naturally be the product of
those two respective assigned values.  (It could even be reasonable to
have IEEE values result from the products of prime values denoting
exponent and fraction sizes and meanings, hidden bit usage,
availability and representations of special values such as subnormals,
infinities, and Not-A-Numbers (NaNs), and so on.)

   This assignment mechanism, while not inherently required for future
versions of the GNU Fortran language, is worth using because it could
ease management of the "space" of supported types much easier in the
long run.

   The above approach suggests a mechanism for specifying inheritance
of intrinsic (built-in) types for an entire, widely portable product
line.  It is certainly reasonable that, unlike programmers of other
languages offering inheritance mechanisms that employ verbose names for
classes and subclasses, along with graphical browsers to elucidate the
relationships, Fortran programmers would employ a mechanism that works
by multiplying prime numbers together and finding the prime factors of
such products.

   Most of the advantages for the above scheme have been explained
above.  One disadvantage is that it could lead to the defining, by the
GNU Fortran language, of some fairly large prime numbers.  This could
lead to the GNU Fortran language being declared "munitions" by the
United States Department of Defense.


File: g77.info,  Node: Constants,  Next: Integer Type,  Prev: Types,  Up: Data Types and Constants

Constants
---------

   (Corresponds to Section 4.2 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77.)

   A "typeless constant" has one of the following forms:

     'BINARY-DIGITS'B
     'OCTAL-DIGITS'O
     'HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS'Z
     'HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS'X

BINARY-DIGITS, OCTAL-DIGITS, and HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS are nonempty
strings of characters in the set `01', `01234567', and
`0123456789ABCDEFabcdef', respectively.  (The value for `A' (and `a')
is 10, for `B' and `b' is 11, and so on.)

   A prefix-radix constant, such as `Z'ABCD'', can optionally be
treated as typeless.  *Note Options Controlling Fortran Dialect:
Fortran Dialect Options, for information on the `-ftypeless-boz' option.

   Typeless constants have values that depend on the context in which
they are used.

   All other constants, called "typed constants", are
interpreted--converted to internal form--according to their inherent
type.  Thus, context is _never_ a determining factor for the type, and
hence the interpretation, of a typed constant.  (All constants in the
ANSI FORTRAN 77 language are typed constants.)

   For example, `1' is always type `INTEGER(KIND=1)' in GNU Fortran
(called default INTEGER in Fortran 90), `9.435784839284958' is always
type `REAL(KIND=1)' (even if the additional precision specified is
lost, and even when used in a `REAL(KIND=2)' context), `1E0' is always
type `REAL(KIND=2)', and `1D0' is always type `REAL(KIND=2)'.


File: g77.info,  Node: Integer Type,  Next: Character Type,  Prev: Constants,  Up: Data Types and Constants

Integer Type
------------

   (Corresponds to Section 4.3 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77.)

   An integer constant also may have one of the following forms:

     B'BINARY-DIGITS'
     O'OCTAL-DIGITS'
     Z'HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS'
     X'HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS'

BINARY-DIGITS, OCTAL-DIGITS, and HEXADECIMAL-DIGITS are nonempty
strings of characters in the set `01', `01234567', and
`0123456789ABCDEFabcdef', respectively.  (The value for `A' (and `a')
is 10, for `B' and `b' is 11, and so on.)


File: g77.info,  Node: Character Type,  Prev: Integer Type,  Up: Data Types and Constants

Character Type
--------------

   (Corresponds to Section 4.8 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77.)

   A character constant may be delimited by a pair of double quotes
(`"') instead of apostrophes.  In this case, an apostrophe within the
constant represents a single apostrophe, while a double quote is
represented in the source text of the constant by two consecutive double
quotes with no intervening spaces.

   A character constant may be empty (have a length of zero).

   A character constant may include a substring specification, The
value of such a constant is the value of the substring--for example,
the value of `'hello'(3:5)' is the same as the value of `'llo''.


File: g77.info,  Node: Expressions,  Next: Specification Statements,  Prev: Data Types and Constants,  Up: Language

Expressions
===========

   (The following information augments or overrides the information in
Chapter 6 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77 in specifying the GNU Fortran
language.  Chapter 6 of that document otherwise serves as the basis for
the relevant aspects of GNU Fortran.)

* Menu:

* %LOC()::


File: g77.info,  Node: %LOC(),  Up: Expressions

The `%LOC()' Construct
----------------------

     %LOC(ARG)

   The `%LOC()' construct is an expression that yields the value of the
location of its argument, ARG, in memory.  The size of the type of the
expression depends on the system--typically, it is equivalent to either
`INTEGER(KIND=1)' or `INTEGER(KIND=2)', though it is actually type
`INTEGER(KIND=7)'.

   The argument to `%LOC()' must be suitable as the left-hand side of
an assignment statement.  That is, it may not be a general expression
involving operators such as addition, subtraction, and so on, nor may
it be a constant.

   Use of `%LOC()' is recommended only for code that is accessing
facilities outside of GNU Fortran, such as operating system or
windowing facilities.  It is best to constrain such uses to isolated
portions of a program--portions that deal specifically and exclusively
with low-level, system-dependent facilities.  Such portions might well
provide a portable interface for use by the program as a whole, but are
themselves not portable, and should be thoroughly tested each time they
are rebuilt using a new compiler or version of a compiler.

   Do not depend on `%LOC()' returning a pointer that can be safely
used to _define_ (change) the argument.  While this might work in some
circumstances, it is hard to predict whether it will continue to work
when a program (that works using this unsafe behavior) is recompiled
using different command-line options or a different version of `g77'.

   Generally, `%LOC()' is safe when used as an argument to a procedure
that makes use of the value of the corresponding dummy argument only
during its activation, and only when such use is restricted to
referencing (reading) the value of the argument to `%LOC()'.

   _Implementation Note:_ Currently, `g77' passes arguments (those not
passed using a construct such as `%VAL()') by reference or descriptor,
depending on the type of the actual argument.  Thus, given `INTEGER I',
`CALL FOO(I)' would seem to mean the same thing as `CALL
FOO(%VAL(%LOC(I)))', and in fact might compile to identical code.

   However, `CALL FOO(%VAL(%LOC(I)))' emphatically means "pass, by
value, the address of `I' in memory".  While `CALL FOO(I)' might use
that same approach in a particular version of `g77', another version or
compiler might choose a different implementation, such as
copy-in/copy-out, to effect the desired behavior--and which will
therefore not necessarily compile to the same code as would `CALL
FOO(%VAL(%LOC(I)))' using the same version or compiler.

   *Note Debugging and Interfacing::, for detailed information on how
this particular version of `g77' implements various constructs.


File: g77.info,  Node: Specification Statements,  Next: Control Statements,  Prev: Expressions,  Up: Language

Specification Statements
========================

   (The following information augments or overrides the information in
Chapter 8 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77 in specifying the GNU Fortran
language.  Chapter 8 of that document otherwise serves as the basis for
the relevant aspects of GNU Fortran.)

* Menu:

* NAMELIST::
* DOUBLE COMPLEX::


File: g77.info,  Node: NAMELIST,  Next: DOUBLE COMPLEX,  Up: Specification Statements

`NAMELIST' Statement
--------------------

   The `NAMELIST' statement, and related I/O constructs, are supported
by the GNU Fortran language in essentially the same way as they are by
`f2c'.

   This follows Fortran 90 with the restriction that on `NAMELIST'
input, subscripts must have the form
     SUBSCRIPT [ `:' SUBSCRIPT [ `:' STRIDE]]
   i.e.
     &xx x(1:3,8:10:2)=1,2,3,4,5,6/
   is allowed, but not, say,
     &xx x(:3,8::2)=1,2,3,4,5,6/

   As an extension of the Fortran 90 form, `$' and `$END' may be used
in place of `&' and `/' in `NAMELIST' input, so that
     $&xx x(1:3,8:10:2)=1,2,3,4,5,6 $end
   could be used instead of the example above.


File: g77.info,  Node: DOUBLE COMPLEX,  Prev: NAMELIST,  Up: Specification Statements

`DOUBLE COMPLEX' Statement
--------------------------

   `DOUBLE COMPLEX' is a type-statement (and type) that specifies the
type `COMPLEX(KIND=2)' in GNU Fortran.


File: g77.info,  Node: Control Statements,  Next: Functions and Subroutines,  Prev: Specification Statements,  Up: Language

Control Statements
==================

   (The following information augments or overrides the information in
Chapter 11 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77 in specifying the GNU Fortran
language.  Chapter 11 of that document otherwise serves as the basis
for the relevant aspects of GNU Fortran.)

* Menu:

* DO WHILE::
* END DO::
* Construct Names::
* CYCLE and EXIT::


File: g77.info,  Node: DO WHILE,  Next: END DO,  Up: Control Statements

DO WHILE
--------

   The `DO WHILE' statement, a feature of both the MIL-STD 1753 and
Fortran 90 standards, is provided by the GNU Fortran language.  The
Fortran 90 "do forever" statement comprising just `DO' is also
supported.


File: g77.info,  Node: END DO,  Next: Construct Names,  Prev: DO WHILE,  Up: Control Statements

END DO
------

   The `END DO' statement is provided by the GNU Fortran language.

   This statement is used in one of two ways:

   * The Fortran 90 meaning, in which it specifies the termination
     point of a single `DO' loop started with a `DO' statement that
     specifies no termination label.

   * The MIL-STD 1753 meaning, in which it specifies the termination
     point of one or more `DO' loops, all of which start with a `DO'
     statement that specify the label defined for the `END DO'
     statement.

     This kind of `END DO' statement is merely a synonym for
     `CONTINUE', except it is permitted only when the statement is
     labeled and a target of one or more labeled `DO' loops.

     It is expected that this use of `END DO' will be removed from the
     GNU Fortran language in the future, though it is likely that it
     will long be supported by `g77' as a dialect form.


File: g77.info,  Node: Construct Names,  Next: CYCLE and EXIT,  Prev: END DO,  Up: Control Statements

Construct Names
---------------

   The GNU Fortran language supports construct names as defined by the
Fortran 90 standard.  These names are local to the program unit and are
defined as follows:

     CONSTRUCT-NAME: BLOCK-STATEMENT

Here, CONSTRUCT-NAME is the construct name itself; its definition is
connoted by the single colon (`:'); and BLOCK-STATEMENT is an `IF',
`DO', or `SELECT CASE' statement that begins a block.

   A block that is given a construct name must also specify the same
construct name in its termination statement:

     END BLOCK CONSTRUCT-NAME

Here, BLOCK must be `IF', `DO', or `SELECT', as appropriate.


File: g77.info,  Node: CYCLE and EXIT,  Prev: Construct Names,  Up: Control Statements

The `CYCLE' and `EXIT' Statements
---------------------------------

   The `CYCLE' and `EXIT' statements specify that the remaining
statements in the current iteration of a particular active (enclosing)
`DO' loop are to be skipped.

   `CYCLE' specifies that these statements are skipped, but the `END
DO' statement that marks the end of the `DO' loop be executed--that is,
the next iteration, if any, is to be started.  If the statement marking
the end of the `DO' loop is not `END DO'--in other words, if the loop
is not a block `DO'--the `CYCLE' statement does not execute that
statement, but does start the next iteration (if any).

   `EXIT' specifies that the loop specified by the `DO' construct is
terminated.

   The `DO' loop affected by `CYCLE' and `EXIT' is the innermost
enclosing `DO' loop when the following forms are used:

     CYCLE
     EXIT

   Otherwise, the following forms specify the construct name of the
pertinent `DO' loop:

     CYCLE CONSTRUCT-NAME
     EXIT CONSTRUCT-NAME

   `CYCLE' and `EXIT' can be viewed as glorified `GO TO' statements.
However, they cannot be easily thought of as `GO TO' statements in
obscure cases involving FORTRAN 77 loops.  For example:

           DO 10 I = 1, 5
           DO 10 J = 1, 5
              IF (J .EQ. 5) EXIT
           DO 10 K = 1, 5
              IF (K .EQ. 3) CYCLE
     10    PRINT *, 'I=', I, ' J=', J, ' K=', K
     20    CONTINUE

In particular, neither the `EXIT' nor `CYCLE' statements above are
equivalent to a `GO TO' statement to either label `10' or `20'.

   To understand the effect of `CYCLE' and `EXIT' in the above
fragment, it is helpful to first translate it to its equivalent using
only block `DO' loops:

           DO I = 1, 5
              DO J = 1, 5
                 IF (J .EQ. 5) EXIT
                 DO K = 1, 5
                    IF (K .EQ. 3) CYCLE
     10             PRINT *, 'I=', I, ' J=', J, ' K=', K
                 END DO
              END DO
           END DO
     20    CONTINUE

   Adding new labels allows translation of `CYCLE' and `EXIT' to `GO
TO' so they may be more easily understood by programmers accustomed to
FORTRAN coding:

           DO I = 1, 5
              DO J = 1, 5
                 IF (J .EQ. 5) GOTO 18
                 DO K = 1, 5
                    IF (K .EQ. 3) GO TO 12
     10             PRINT *, 'I=', I, ' J=', J, ' K=', K
     12          END DO
              END DO
     18    END DO
     20    CONTINUE

Thus, the `CYCLE' statement in the innermost loop skips over the
`PRINT' statement as it begins the next iteration of the loop, while
the `EXIT' statement in the middle loop ends that loop but _not_ the
outermost loop.


File: g77.info,  Node: Functions and Subroutines,  Next: Scope and Classes of Names,  Prev: Control Statements,  Up: Language

Functions and Subroutines
=========================

   (The following information augments or overrides the information in
Chapter 15 of ANSI X3.9-1978 FORTRAN 77 in specifying the GNU Fortran
language.  Chapter 15 of that document otherwise serves as the basis
for the relevant aspects of GNU Fortran.)

* Menu:

* %VAL()::
* %REF()::
* %DESCR()::
* Generics and Specifics::
* REAL() and AIMAG() of Complex::
* CMPLX() of DOUBLE PRECISION::
* MIL-STD 1753::
* f77/f2c Intrinsics::
* Table of Intrinsic Functions::


File: g77.info,  Node: %VAL(),  Next: %REF(),  Up: Functions and Subroutines

The `%VAL()' Construct
----------------------

     %VAL(ARG)

   The `%VAL()' construct specifies that an argument, ARG, is to be
passed by value, instead of by reference or descriptor.

   `%VAL()' is restricted to actual arguments in invocations of
external procedures.

   Use of `%VAL()' is recommended only for code that is accessing
facilities outside of GNU Fortran, such as operating system or
windowing facilities.  It is best to constrain such uses to isolated
portions of a program--portions the deal specifically and exclusively
with low-level, system-dependent facilities.  Such portions might well
provide a portable interface for use by the program as a whole, but are
themselves not portable, and should be thoroughly tested each time they
are rebuilt using a new compiler or version of a compiler.

   _Implementation Note:_ Currently, `g77' passes all arguments either
by reference or by descriptor.

   Thus, use of `%VAL()' tends to be restricted to cases where the
called procedure is written in a language other than Fortran that
supports call-by-value semantics.  (C is an example of such a language.)

   *Note Procedures (SUBROUTINE and FUNCTION): Procedures, for detailed
information on how this particular version of `g77' passes arguments to
procedures.


File: g77.info,  Node: %REF(),  Next: %DESCR(),  Prev: %VAL(),  Up: Functions and Subroutines

The `%REF()' Construct
----------------------

     %REF(ARG)

   The `%REF()' construct specifies that an argument, ARG, is to be
passed by reference, instead of by value or descriptor.

   `%REF()' is restricted to actual arguments in invocations of
external procedures.

   Use of `%REF()' is recommended only for code that is accessing
facilities outside of GNU Fortran, such as operating system or
windowing facilities.  It is best to constrain such uses to isolated
portions of a program--portions the deal specifically and exclusively
with low-level, system-dependent facilities.  Such portions might well
provide a portable interface for use by the program as a whole, but are
themselves not portable, and should be thoroughly tested each time they
are rebuilt using a new compiler or version of a compiler.

   Do not depend on `%REF()' supplying a pointer to the procedure being
invoked.  While that is a likely implementation choice, other
implementation choices are available that preserve Fortran
pass-by-reference semantics without passing a pointer to the argument,
ARG.  (For example, a copy-in/copy-out implementation.)

   _Implementation Note:_ Currently, `g77' passes all arguments (other
than variables and arrays of type `CHARACTER') by reference.  Future
versions of, or dialects supported by, `g77' might not pass `CHARACTER'
functions by reference.

   Thus, use of `%REF()' tends to be restricted to cases where ARG is
type `CHARACTER' but the called procedure accesses it via a means other
than the method used for Fortran `CHARACTER' arguments.

   *Note Procedures (SUBROUTINE and FUNCTION): Procedures, for detailed
information on how this particular version of `g77' passes arguments to
procedures.


File: g77.info,  Node: %DESCR(),  Next: Generics and Specifics,  Prev: %REF(),  Up: Functions and Subroutines

The `%DESCR()' Construct
------------------------

     %DESCR(ARG)

   The `%DESCR()' construct specifies that an argument, ARG, is to be
passed by descriptor, instead of by value or reference.

   `%DESCR()' is restricted to actual arguments in invocations of
external procedures.

   Use of `%DESCR()' is recommended only for code that is accessing
facilities outside of GNU Fortran, such as operating system or
windowing facilities.  It is best to constrain such uses to isolated
portions of a program--portions the deal specifically and exclusively
with low-level, system-dependent facilities.  Such portions might well
provide a portable interface for use by the program as a whole, but are
themselves not portable, and should be thoroughly tested each time they
are rebuilt using a new compiler or version of a compiler.

   Do not depend on `%DESCR()' supplying a pointer and/or a length
passed by value to the procedure being invoked.  While that is a likely
implementation choice, other implementation choices are available that
preserve the pass-by-reference semantics without passing a pointer to
the argument, ARG.  (For example, a copy-in/copy-out implementation.)
And, future versions of `g77' might change the way descriptors are
implemented, such as passing a single argument pointing to a record
containing the pointer/length information instead of passing that same
information via two arguments as it currently does.

   _Implementation Note:_ Currently, `g77' passes all variables and
arrays of type `CHARACTER' by descriptor.  Future versions of, or
dialects supported by, `g77' might pass `CHARACTER' functions by
descriptor as well.

   Thus, use of `%DESCR()' tends to be restricted to cases where ARG is
not type `CHARACTER' but the called procedure accesses it via a means
similar to the method used for Fortran `CHARACTER' arguments.

   *Note Procedures (SUBROUTINE and FUNCTION): Procedures, for detailed
information on how this particular version of `g77' passes arguments to
procedures.


File: g77.info,  Node: Generics and Specifics,  Next: REAL() and AIMAG() of Complex,  Prev: %DESCR(),  Up: Functions and Subroutines

Generics and Specifics
----------------------

   The ANSI FORTRAN 77 language defines generic and specific intrinsics.
In short, the distinctions are:

   * _Specific_ intrinsics have specific types for their arguments and
     a specific return type.

   * _Generic_ intrinsics are treated, on a case-by-case basis in the
     program's source code, as one of several possible specific
     intrinsics.

     Typically, a generic intrinsic has a return type that is
     determined by the type of one or more of its arguments.

   The GNU Fortran language generalizes these concepts somewhat,
especially by providing intrinsic subroutines and generic intrinsics
that are treated as either a specific intrinsic subroutine or a
specific intrinsic function (e.g. `SECOND').

   However, GNU Fortran avoids generalizing this concept to the point
where existing code would be accepted as meaning something possibly
different than what was intended.

   For example, `ABS' is a generic intrinsic, so all working code
written using `ABS' of an `INTEGER' argument expects an `INTEGER'
return value.  Similarly, all such code expects that `ABS' of an
`INTEGER*2' argument returns an `INTEGER*2' return value.

   Yet, `IABS' is a _specific_ intrinsic that accepts only an
`INTEGER(KIND=1)' argument.  Code that passes something other than an
`INTEGER(KIND=1)' argument to `IABS' is not valid GNU Fortran code,
because it is not clear what the author intended.

   For example, if `J' is `INTEGER(KIND=6)', `IABS(J)' is not defined
by the GNU Fortran language, because the programmer might have used
that construct to mean any of the following, subtly different, things:

   * Convert `J' to `INTEGER(KIND=1)' first (as if `IABS(INT(J))' had
     been written).

   * Convert the result of the intrinsic to `INTEGER(KIND=1)' (as if
     `INT(ABS(J))' had been written).

   * No conversion (as if `ABS(J)' had been written).

   The distinctions matter especially when types and values wider than
`INTEGER(KIND=1)' (such as `INTEGER(KIND=2)'), or when operations
performing more "arithmetic" than absolute-value, are involved.

   The following sample program is not a valid GNU Fortran program, but
might be accepted by other compilers.  If so, the output is likely to
be revealing in terms of how a given compiler treats intrinsics (that
normally are specific) when they are given arguments that do not
conform to their stated requirements:

           PROGRAM JCB002
     C Version 1:
     C Modified 1999-02-15 (Burley) to delete my email address.
     C Modified 1997-05-21 (Burley) to accommodate compilers that implement
     C INT(I1-I2) as INT(I1)-INT(I2) given INTEGER*2 I1,I2.
     C
     C Version 0:
     C Written by James Craig Burley 1997-02-20.
     C
     C Purpose:
     C Determine how compilers handle non-standard IDIM
     C on INTEGER*2 operands, which presumably can be
     C extrapolated into understanding how the compiler
     C generally treats specific intrinsics that are passed
     C arguments not of the correct types.
     C
     C If your compiler implements INTEGER*2 and INTEGER
     C as the same type, change all INTEGER*2 below to
     C INTEGER*1.
     C
           INTEGER*2 I0, I4
           INTEGER I1, I2, I3
           INTEGER*2 ISMALL, ILARGE
           INTEGER*2 ITOOLG, ITWO
           INTEGER*2 ITMP
           LOGICAL L2, L3, L4
     C
     C Find smallest INTEGER*2 number.
     C
           ISMALL=0
      10   I0 = ISMALL-1
           IF ((I0 .GE. ISMALL) .OR. (I0+1 .NE. ISMALL)) GOTO 20
           ISMALL = I0
           GOTO 10
      20   CONTINUE
     C
     C Find largest INTEGER*2 number.
     C
           ILARGE=0
      30   I0 = ILARGE+1
           IF ((I0 .LE. ILARGE) .OR. (I0-1 .NE. ILARGE)) GOTO 40
           ILARGE = I0
           GOTO 30
      40   CONTINUE
     C
     C Multiplying by two adds stress to the situation.
     C
           ITWO = 2
     C
     C Need a number that, added to -2, is too wide to fit in I*2.
     C
           ITOOLG = ISMALL
     C
     C Use IDIM the straightforward way.
     C
           I1 = IDIM (ILARGE, ISMALL) * ITWO + ITOOLG
     C
     C Calculate result for first interpretation.
     C
           I2 = (INT (ILARGE) - INT (ISMALL)) * ITWO + ITOOLG
     C
     C Calculate result for second interpretation.
     C
           ITMP = ILARGE - ISMALL
           I3 = (INT (ITMP)) * ITWO + ITOOLG
     C
     C Calculate result for third interpretation.
     C
           I4 = (ILARGE - ISMALL) * ITWO + ITOOLG
     C
     C Print results.
     C
           PRINT *, 'ILARGE=', ILARGE
           PRINT *, 'ITWO=', ITWO
           PRINT *, 'ITOOLG=', ITOOLG
           PRINT *, 'ISMALL=', ISMALL
           PRINT *, 'I1=', I1
           PRINT *, 'I2=', I2
           PRINT *, 'I3=', I3
           PRINT *, 'I4=', I4
           PRINT *
           L2 = (I1 .EQ. I2)
           L3 = (I1 .EQ. I3)
           L4 = (I1 .EQ. I4)
           IF (L2 .AND. .NOT.L3 .AND. .NOT.L4) THEN
              PRINT *, 'Interp 1: IDIM(I*2,I*2) => IDIM(INT(I*2),INT(I*2))'
              STOP
           END IF
           IF (L3 .AND. .NOT.L2 .AND. .NOT.L4) THEN
              PRINT *, 'Interp 2: IDIM(I*2,I*2) => INT(DIM(I*2,I*2))'
              STOP
           END IF
           IF (L4 .AND. .NOT.L2 .AND. .NOT.L3) THEN
              PRINT *, 'Interp 3: IDIM(I*2,I*2) => DIM(I*2,I*2)'
              STOP
           END IF
           PRINT *, 'Results need careful analysis.'
           END

   No future version of the GNU Fortran language will likely permit
specific intrinsic invocations with wrong-typed arguments (such as
`IDIM' in the above example), since it has been determined that
disagreements exist among many production compilers on the
interpretation of such invocations.  These disagreements strongly
suggest that Fortran programmers, and certainly existing Fortran
programs, disagree about the meaning of such invocations.

   The first version of `JCB002' didn't accommodate some compilers'
treatment of `INT(I1-I2)' where `I1' and `I2' are `INTEGER*2'.  In such
a case, these compilers apparently convert both operands to `INTEGER*4'
and then do an `INTEGER*4' subtraction, instead of doing an `INTEGER*2'
subtraction on the original values in `I1' and `I2'.

   However, the results of the careful analyses done on the outputs of
programs compiled by these various compilers show that they all
implement either `Interp 1' or `Interp 2' above.

   Specifically, it is believed that the new version of `JCB002' above
will confirm that:

   * Digital Semiconductor ("DEC") Alpha OSF/1, HP-UX 10.0.1, AIX 3.2.5
     `f77' compilers all implement `Interp 1'.

   * IRIX 5.3 `f77' compiler implements `Interp 2'.

   * Solaris 2.5, SunOS 4.1.3, DECstation ULTRIX 4.3, and IRIX 6.1
     `f77' compilers all implement `Interp 3'.

   If you get different results than the above for the stated
compilers, or have results for other compilers that might be worth
adding to the above list, please let us know the details (compiler
product, version, machine, results, and so on).


File: g77.info,  Node: REAL() and AIMAG() of Complex,  Next: CMPLX() of DOUBLE PRECISION,  Prev: Generics and Specifics,  Up: Functions and Subroutines

`REAL()' and `AIMAG()' of Complex
---------------------------------

   The GNU Fortran language disallows `REAL(EXPR)' and `AIMAG(EXPR)',
where EXPR is any `COMPLEX' type other than `COMPLEX(KIND=1)', except
when they are used in the following way:

     REAL(REAL(EXPR))
     REAL(AIMAG(EXPR))

The above forms explicitly specify that the desired effect is to
convert the real or imaginary part of EXPR, which might be some `REAL'
type other than `REAL(KIND=1)', to type `REAL(KIND=1)', and have that
serve as the value of the expression.

   The GNU Fortran language offers clearly named intrinsics to extract
the real and imaginary parts of a complex entity without any conversion:

     REALPART(EXPR)
     IMAGPART(EXPR)

   To express the above using typical extended FORTRAN 77, use the
following constructs (when EXPR is `COMPLEX(KIND=2)'):

     DBLE(EXPR)
     DIMAG(EXPR)

   The FORTRAN 77 language offers no way to explicitly specify the real
and imaginary parts of a complex expression of arbitrary type,
apparently as a result of requiring support for only one `COMPLEX' type
(`COMPLEX(KIND=1)').  The concepts of converting an expression to type
`REAL(KIND=1)' and of extracting the real part of a complex expression
were thus "smooshed" by FORTRAN 77 into a single intrinsic, since they
happened to have the exact same effect in that language (due to having
only one `COMPLEX' type).

   _Note:_ When `-ff90' is in effect, `g77' treats `REAL(EXPR)', where
EXPR is of type `COMPLEX', as `REALPART(EXPR)', whereas with
`-fugly-complex -fno-f90' in effect, it is treated as
`REAL(REALPART(EXPR))'.

   *Note Ugly Complex Part Extraction::, for more information.


File: g77.info,  Node: CMPLX() of DOUBLE PRECISION,  Next: MIL-STD 1753,  Prev: REAL() and AIMAG() of Complex,  Up: Functions and Subroutines

`CMPLX()' of `DOUBLE PRECISION'
-------------------------------

   In accordance with Fortran 90 and at least some (perhaps all) other
compilers, the GNU Fortran language defines `CMPLX()' as always
returning a result that is type `COMPLEX(KIND=1)'.

   This means `CMPLX(D1,D2)', where `D1' and `D2' are `REAL(KIND=2)'
(`DOUBLE PRECISION'), is treated as:

     CMPLX(SNGL(D1), SNGL(D2))

   (It was necessary for Fortran 90 to specify this behavior for
`DOUBLE PRECISION' arguments, since that is the behavior mandated by
FORTRAN 77.)

   The GNU Fortran language also provides the `DCMPLX()' intrinsic,
which is provided by some FORTRAN 77 compilers to construct a `DOUBLE
COMPLEX' entity from of `DOUBLE PRECISION' operands.  However, this
solution does not scale well when more `COMPLEX' types (having various
precisions and ranges) are offered by Fortran implementations.

   Fortran 90 extends the `CMPLX()' intrinsic by adding an extra
argument used to specify the desired kind of complex result.  However,
this solution is somewhat awkward to use, and `g77' currently does not
support it.

   The GNU Fortran language provides a simple way to build a complex
value out of two numbers, with the precise type of the value determined
by the types of the two numbers (via the usual type-promotion
mechanism):

     COMPLEX(REAL, IMAG)

   When REAL and IMAG are the same `REAL' types, `COMPLEX()' performs
no conversion other than to put them together to form a complex result
of the same (complex version of real) type.

   *Note Complex Intrinsic::, for more information.

