This is cvsclient.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.0 from
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/doc/cvsclient.texi.

INFO-DIR-SECTION Programming
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
* cvsclient: (cvsclient).      The CVS client/server protocol.
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Top,  Next: Introduction,  Up: (dir)

CVS Client/Server
*****************

   This document describes the client/server protocol used by CVS.  It
does not describe how to use or administer client/server CVS; see the
regular CVS manual for that.  This is version 1.11.1p1 of the protocol
specification--*Note Introduction::, for more on what this version
number means.

* Menu:

* Introduction::      What is CVS and what is the client/server protocol for?
* Goals::             Basic design decisions, requirements, scope, etc.
* Connection and Authentication::  Various ways to connect to the server
* Password scrambling::  Scrambling used by pserver
* Protocol::          Complete description of the protocol
* Protocol Notes::    Possible enhancements, limitations, etc. of the protocol


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Introduction,  Next: Goals,  Prev: Top,  Up: Top

Introduction
************

   CVS is a version control system (with some additional configuration
management functionality).  It maintains a central "repository" which
stores files (often source code), including past versions, information
about who modified them and when, and so on.  People who wish to look
at or modify those files, known as "developers", use CVS to "check out"
a "working directory" from the repository, to "check in" new versions
of files to the repository, and other operations such as viewing the
modification history of a file.  If developers are connected to the
repository by a network, particularly a slow or flaky one, the most
efficient way to use the network is with the CVS-specific protocol
described in this document.

   Developers, using the machine on which they store their working
directory, run the CVS "client" program.  To perform operations which
cannot be done locally, it connects to the CVS "server" program, which
maintains the repository.  For more information on how to connect see
*Note Connection and Authentication::.

   This document describes the CVS protocol.  Unfortunately, it does not
yet completely document one aspect of the protocol--the detailed
operation of each CVS command and option--and one must look at the CVS
user documentation, `cvs.texinfo', for that information.  The protocol
is non-proprietary (anyone who wants to is encouraged to implement it)
and an implementation, known as CVS, is available under the GNU Public
License.  The CVS distribution, containing this implementation,
`cvs.texinfo', and a copy (possibly more or less up to date than what
you are reading now) of this document, `cvsclient.texi', can be found
at the usual GNU FTP sites, with a filename such as
`cvs-VERSION.tar.gz'.

   This is version 1.11.1p1 of the protocol specification.  This
version number is intended only to aid in distinguishing different
versions of this specification.  Although the specification is currently
maintained in conjunction with the CVS implementation, and carries the
same version number, it also intends to document what is involved with
interoperating with other implementations (such as other versions of
CVS); see *Note Requirements::.  This version number should not be used
by clients or servers to determine what variant of the protocol to
speak; they should instead use the `valid-requests' and
`Valid-responses' mechanism (*note Protocol::), which is more flexible.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Goals,  Next: Connection and Authentication,  Prev: Introduction,  Up: Top

Goals
*****

   * Do not assume any access to the repository other than via this
     protocol.  It does not depend on NFS, rdist, etc.

   * Providing a reliable transport is outside this protocol.  The
     protocol expects a reliable transport that is transparent (that
     is, there is no translation of characters, including characters
     such as such as linefeeds or carriage returns), and can transmit
     all 256 octets (for example for proper handling of binary files,
     compression, and encryption).  The encoding of characters
     specified by the protocol (the names of requests and so on) is the
     invariant ISO 646 character set (a subset of most popular
     character sets including ASCII and others).  For more details on
     running the protocol over the TCP reliable transport, see *Note
     Connection and Authentication::.

   * Security and authentication are handled outside this protocol (but
     see below about `cvs kserver' and `cvs pserver').

   * The protocol makes it possible for updates to be atomic with
     respect to checkins; that is if someone commits changes to several
     files in one cvs command, then an update by someone else would
     either get all the changes, or none of them.  The current CVS
     server can't do this, but that isn't the protocol's fault.

   * The protocol is, with a few exceptions, transaction-based.  That
     is, the client sends all its requests (without waiting for server
     responses), and then waits for the server to send back all
     responses (without waiting for further client requests).  This has
     the advantage of minimizing network turnarounds and the
     disadvantage of sometimes transferring more data than would be
     necessary if there were a richer interaction.  Another, more
     subtle, advantage is that there is no need for the protocol to
     provide locking for features such as making checkins atomic with
     respect to updates.  Any such locking can be handled entirely by
     the server.  A good server implementation (such as the current CVS
     server) will make sure that it does not have any such locks in
     place whenever it is waiting for communication with the client;
     this prevents one client on a slow or flaky network from
     interfering with the work of others.

   * It is a general design goal to provide only one way to do a given
     operation (where possible).  For example, implementations have no
     choice about whether to terminate lines with linefeeds or some
     other character(s), and request and response names are
     case-sensitive.  This is to enhance interoperability.  If a
     protocol allows more than one way to do something, it is all too
     easy for some implementations to support only some of them
     (perhaps accidentally).


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Connection and Authentication,  Next: Password scrambling,  Prev: Goals,  Up: Top

How to Connect to and Authenticate Oneself to the CVS server
************************************************************

   Connection and authentication occurs before the CVS protocol itself
is started.  There are several ways to connect.

server
     If the client has a way to execute commands on the server, and
     provide input to the commands and output from them, then it can
     connect that way.  This could be the usual rsh (port 514)
     protocol, Kerberos rsh, SSH, or any similar mechanism.  The client
     may allow the user to specify the name of the server program; the
     default is `cvs'.  It is invoked with one argument, `server'.
     Once it invokes the server, the client proceeds to start the cvs
     protocol.

kserver
     The kerberized server listens on a port (in the current
     implementation, by having inetd call "cvs kserver") which defaults
     to 1999.  The client connects, sends the usual kerberos
     authentication information, and then starts the cvs protocol.
     Note: port 1999 is officially registered for another use, and in
     any event one cannot register more than one port for CVS, so
     GSS-API (see below) is recommended instead of kserver as a way to
     support kerberos.

pserver
     The name "pserver" is somewhat confusing.  It refers to both a
     generic framework which allows the CVS protocol to support several
     authentication mechanisms, and a name for a specific mechanism
     which transfers a username and a cleartext password.  Servers need
     not support all mechanisms, and in fact servers will typically
     want to support only those mechanisms which meet the relevant
     security needs.

     The pserver server listens on a port (in the current
     implementation, by having inetd call "cvs pserver") which defaults
     to 2401 (this port is officially registered).  The client
     connects, and sends the following:

        * the string `BEGIN AUTH REQUEST', a linefeed,

        * the cvs root, a linefeed,

        * the username, a linefeed,

        * the password trivially encoded (see *Note Password
          scrambling::), a linefeed,

        * the string `END AUTH REQUEST', and a linefeed.

     The client must send the identical string for cvs root both here
     and later in the `Root' request of the cvs protocol itself.
     Servers are encouraged to enforce this restriction.  The possible
     server responses (each of which is followed by a linefeed) are the
     following.  Note that although there is a small similarity between
     this authentication protocol and the cvs protocol, they are
     separate.

    `I LOVE YOU'
          The authentication is successful.  The client proceeds with
          the cvs protocol itself.

    `I HATE YOU'
          The authentication fails.  After sending this response, the
          server may close the connection.  It is up to the server to
          decide whether to give this response, which is generic, or a
          more specific response using `E' and/or `error'.

    `E TEXT'
          Provide a message for the user.  After this reponse, the
          authentication protocol continues with another response.
          Typically the server will provide a series of `E' responses
          followed by `error'.  Compatibility note: CVS 1.9.10 and
          older clients will print `unrecognized auth response' and
          TEXT, and then exit, upon receiving this response.

    `error CODE TEXT'
          The authentication fails.  After sending this response, the
          server may close the connection.  The CODE is a code
          describing why it failed, intended for computer consumption.
          The only code currently defined is `0' which is nonspecific,
          but clients must silently treat any unrecognized codes as
          nonspecific.  The TEXT should be supplied to the user.
          Compatibility note: CVS 1.9.10 and older clients will print
          `unrecognized auth response' and TEXT, and then exit, upon
          receiving this response.  Note that TEXT for this response,
          or the TEXT in an `E' response, is not designed for machine
          parsing.  More vigorous use of CODE, or future extensions,
          will be needed to prove a cleaner machine-parseable
          indication of what the error was.

     If the client wishes to merely authenticate without starting the
     cvs protocol, the procedure is the same, except BEGIN AUTH REQUEST
     is replaced with BEGIN VERIFICATION REQUEST, END AUTH REQUEST is
     replaced with END VERIFICATION REQUEST, and upon receipt of I LOVE
     YOU the connection is closed rather than continuing.

     Another mechanism is GSSAPI authentication.  GSSAPI is a generic
     interface to security services such as kerberos.  GSSAPI is
     specified in RFC2078 (GSSAPI version 2) and RFC1508 (GSSAPI
     version 1); we are not aware of differences between the two which
     affect the protocol in incompatible ways, so we make no attempt to
     specify one version or the other.  The procedure here is to start
     with `BEGIN GSSAPI REQUEST'.  GSSAPI authentication information is
     then exchanged between the client and the server.  Each packet of
     information consists of a two byte big endian length, followed by
     that many bytes of data.  After the GSSAPI authentication is
     complete, the server continues with the responses described above
     (`I LOVE YOU', etc.).

future possibilities
     There are a nearly unlimited number of ways to connect and
     authenticate.  One might want to allow access based on IP address
     (similar to the usual rsh protocol but with different/no
     restrictions on ports < 1024), to adopt mechanisms such as
     Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM), to allow users to run
     their own servers under their own usernames without root access,
     or any number of other possibilities.  The way to add future
     mechanisms, for the most part, should be to continue to use port
     2401, but to use different strings in place of `BEGIN AUTH
     REQUEST'.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Password scrambling,  Next: Protocol,  Prev: Connection and Authentication,  Up: Top

Password scrambling algorithm
*****************************

   The pserver authentication protocol, as described in *Note
Connection and Authentication::, trivially encodes the passwords.  This
is only to prevent inadvertent compromise; it provides no protection
against even a relatively unsophisticated attacker.  For comparison,
HTTP Basic Authentication (as described in RFC2068) uses BASE64 for a
similar purpose.  CVS uses its own algorithm, described here.

   The scrambled password starts with `A', which serves to identify the
scrambling algorithm in use.  After that follows a single octet for
each character in the password, according to a fixed encoding.  The
values are shown here, with the encoded values in decimal.  Control
characters, space, and characters outside the invariant ISO 646
character set are not shown; such characters are not recommended for use
in passwords.  There is a long discussion of character set issues in
*Note Protocol Notes::.

             0 111           P 125           p  58
     ! 120   1  52   A  57   Q  55   a 121   q 113
     "  53   2  75   B  83   R  54   b 117   r  32
             3 119   C  43   S  66   c 104   s  90
             4  49   D  46   T 124   d 101   t  44
     % 109   5  34   E 102   U 126   e 100   u  98
     &  72   6  82   F  40   V  59   f  69   v  60
     ' 108   7  81   G  89   W  47   g  73   w  51
     (  70   8  95   H  38   X  92   h  99   x  33
     )  64   9  65   I 103   Y  71   i  63   y  97
     *  76   : 112   J  45   Z 115   j  94   z  62
     +  67   ;  86   K  50           k  93
     , 116   < 118   L  42           l  39
     -  74   = 110   M 123           m  37
     .  68   > 122   N  91           n  61
     /  87   ? 105   O  35   _  56   o  48


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Protocol,  Next: Protocol Notes,  Prev: Password scrambling,  Up: Top

The CVS client/server protocol
******************************

   In the following, `\n' refers to a linefeed and `\t' refers to a
horizontal tab; "requests" are what the client sends and "responses"
are what the server sends.  In general, the connection is governed by
the client--the server does not send responses without first receiving
requests to do so; see *Note Response intro:: for more details of this
convention.

   It is typical, early in the connection, for the client to transmit a
`Valid-responses' request, containing all the responses it supports,
followed by a `valid-requests' request, which elicits from the server a
`Valid-requests' response containing all the requests it understands.
In this way, the client and server each find out what the other
supports before exchanging large amounts of data (such as file
contents).

* Menu:


General protocol conventions:

* Entries Lines::                   Transmitting RCS data
* File Modes::                      Read, write, execute, and possibly more...
* Filenames::                       Conventions regarding filenames
* File transmissions::              How file contents are transmitted
* Strings::                         Strings in various requests and responses
* Dates::                           Times and dates

The protocol itself:

* Request intro::                   General conventions relating to requests
* Requests::                        List of requests
* Response intro::                  General conventions relating to responses
* Response pathnames::              The "pathname" in responses
* Responses::                       List of responses
* Text tags::                       More details about the MT response

An example session, and some further observations:

* Example::                         A conversation between client and server
* Requirements::                    Things not to omit from an implementation
* Obsolete::                        Former protocol features


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Entries Lines,  Next: File Modes,  Up: Protocol

Entries Lines
=============

   Entries lines are transmitted as:

     / NAME / VERSION / CONFLICT / OPTIONS / TAG_OR_DATE

   TAG_OR_DATE is either `T' TAG or `D' DATE or empty.  If it is
followed by a slash, anything after the slash shall be silently ignored.

   VERSION can be empty, or start with `0' or `-', for no user file,
new user file, or user file to be removed, respectively.

   CONFLICT, if it starts with `+', indicates that the file had
conflicts in it.  The rest of CONFLICT is `=' if the timestamp matches
the file, or anything else if it doesn't.  If CONFLICT does not start
with a `+', it is silently ignored.

   OPTIONS signifies the keyword expansion options (for example `-ko').
In an `Entry' request, this indicates the options that were specified
with the file from the previous file updating response (*note Response
intro::, for a list of file updating responses); if the client is
specifying the `-k' or `-A' option to `update', then it is the server
which figures out what overrides what.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: File Modes,  Next: Filenames,  Prev: Entries Lines,  Up: Protocol

File Modes
==========

   A mode is any number of repetitions of

     MODE-TYPE = DATA

   separated by `,'.

   MODE-TYPE is an identifier composed of alphanumeric characters.
Currently specified: `u' for user, `g' for group, `o' for other (see
below for discussion of whether these have their POSIX meaning or are
more loose).  Unrecognized values of MODE-TYPE are silently ignored.

   DATA consists of any data not containing `,', `\0' or `\n'.  For
`u', `g', and `o' mode types, data consists of alphanumeric characters,
where `r' means read, `w' means write, `x' means execute, and
unrecognized letters are silently ignored.

   The two most obvious ways in which the mode matters are: (1) is it
writeable?  This is used by the developer communication features, and
is implemented even on OS/2 (and could be implemented on DOS), whose
notion of mode is limited to a readonly bit. (2) is it executable?
Unix CVS users need CVS to store this setting (for shell scripts and
the like).  The current CVS implementation on unix does a little bit
more than just maintain these two settings, but it doesn't really have
a nice general facility to store or version control the mode, even on
unix, much less across operating systems with diverse protection
features.  So all the ins and outs of what the mode means across
operating systems haven't really been worked out (e.g. should the VMS
port use ACLs to get POSIX semantics for groups?).


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Filenames,  Next: File transmissions,  Prev: File Modes,  Up: Protocol

Conventions regarding transmission of file names
================================================

   In most contexts, `/' is used to separate directory and file names
in filenames, and any use of other conventions (for example, that the
user might type on the command line) is converted to that form.  The
only exceptions might be a few cases in which the server provides a
magic cookie which the client then repeats verbatim, but as the server
has not yet been ported beyond unix, the two rules provide the same
answer (and what to do if future server ports are operating on a
repository like e:/foo or CVS_ROOT:[FOO.BAR] has not been carefully
thought out).

   Characters outside the invariant ISO 646 character set should be
avoided in filenames.  This restriction may need to be relaxed to allow
for characters such as `[' and `]' (see above about non-unix servers);
this has not been carefully considered (and currently implementations
probably use whatever character sets that the operating systems they
are running on allow, and/or that users specify).  Of course the most
portable practice is to restrict oneself further, to the POSIX portable
filename character set as specified in POSIX.1.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: File transmissions,  Next: Strings,  Prev: Filenames,  Up: Protocol

File transmissions
==================

   File contents (noted below as FILE TRANSMISSION) can be sent in one
of two forms.  The simpler form is a number of bytes, followed by a
linefeed, followed by the specified number of bytes of file contents.
These are the entire contents of the specified file.  Second, if both
client and server support `gzip-file-contents', a `z' may precede the
length, and the `file contents' sent are actually compressed with
`gzip' (RFC1952/1951) compression.  The length specified is that of the
compressed version of the file.

   In neither case are the file content followed by any additional data.
The transmission of a file will end with a linefeed iff that file (or
its compressed form) ends with a linefeed.

   The encoding of file contents depends on the value for the `-k'
option.  If the file is binary (as specified by the `-kb' option in the
appropriate place), then it is just a certain number of octets, and the
protocol contributes nothing towards determining the encoding (using
the file name is one widespread, if not universally popular, mechanism).
If the file is text (not binary), then the file is sent as a series of
lines, separated by linefeeds.  If the keyword expansion is set to
something other than `-ko', then it is expected that the file conform
to the RCS expectations regarding keyword expansion--in particular,
that it is in a character set such as ASCII in which 0x24 is a dollar
sign (`$').


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Strings,  Next: Dates,  Prev: File transmissions,  Up: Protocol

Strings
=======

   In various contexts, for example the `Argument' request and the `M'
response, one transmits what is essentially an arbitrary string.  Often
this will have been supplied by the user (for example, the `-m' option
to the `ci' request).  The protocol has no mechanism to specify the
character set of such strings; it would be fairly safe to stick to the
invariant ISO 646 character set but the existing practice is probably
to just transmit whatever the user specifies, and hope that everyone
involved agrees which character set is in use, or sticks to a common
subset.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Dates,  Next: Request intro,  Prev: Strings,  Up: Protocol

Dates
=====

   The protocol contains times and dates in various places.

   For the `-D' option to the `annotate', `co', `diff', `export',
`history', `rannotate', `rdiff', `rtag', `tag', and `update' requests,
the server should support two formats:

     26 May 1997 13:01:40 -0000  ; RFC 822 as modified by RFC 1123
     5/26/1997 13:01:40 GMT    ; traditional

   The former format is preferred; the latter however is sent by the CVS
command line client (versions 1.5 through at least 1.9).

   For the `-d' option to the `log' and `rlog' requests, servers should
at least support RFC 822/1123 format.  Clients are encouraged to use
this format too (the command line CVS client, version 1.10 and older,
just passed along the date format specified by the user, however).

   The `Mod-time' response and `Checkin-time' request use RFC 822/1123
format (see the descriptions of that response and request for details).

   For `Notify', see the description of that request.


File: cvsclient.info,  Node: Request intro,  Next: Requests,  Prev: Dates,  Up: Protocol

Request intro
=============

   By convention, requests which begin with a capital letter do not
elicit a response from the server, while all others do - save one.  The
exception is `gzip-file-contents'.  Unrecognized requests will always
elicit a response from the server, even if that request begins with a
capital letter.

   The term "command" means a request which expects a response (except
`valid-requests').  The general model is that the client transmits a
great number of requests, but nothing happens until the very end when
the client transmits a command.  Although the intention is that
transmitting several commands in one connection should be legal,
existing servers probably have some bugs with some combinations of more
than one command, and so clients may find it necessary to make several
connections in some cases.  This should be thought of as a workaround
rather than a desired attribute of the protocol.

